Restaurant
Mr Chips
Honeyborough, Neyland, SA73 1SE
Chip shop up at Honeyborough, Neyland.
Hygiene 5/5Food Standards Agency, inspected 30 January 2026 · official record
Details
- Address
- Honeyborough, Neyland, SA73 1SE
- Dogs
- Not recorded — please ring ahead
Visitor reviews
No reviews yet — been to Mr Chips? Yours can be the first.
Write a review
Where to stay near Mr Chips
Places to stay in and around Neyland. We earn a commission if you book through these links.
Neyland · Sleeps 4 · 2 beds
With the scenic Haven waterway on its doorstep this beautiful property in Hazelbeach is great for water-lovers walkers and families alike. The Pembrokeshire Coastal Path runs close to the cottage and stretches for 186 miles giving plenty of walking opportunity. The local watersid
from £415/week
View stay →Bookable via holidaycottages.co.uk
Nearby
Car park
Car parkNeyland
Free
Enterprise Cycles
ActivitiesHoneyborough, Neyland, SA73 1SE
Tea rooms up at Honeyborough on the edge of Neyland, with a top food-hygiene score.
R & R BBQ n' Grill
RestaurantHoneyborough, Neyland, SA73 1SE
Barbecue and grill up at Honeyborough, Neyland.
Car park
Car parkNeyland
Free
Honeyborough Green, Neyland, SA73 1RG
Small local on Honeyborough Green in upper Neyland.
Stay near Mr Chips
Hand-picked places to stay within about 3 miles, nearest first. Our picks are data-driven — we haven’t stayed — and we earn a commission when you book through a partner link. How that works.
Neyland · Sleeps 4 · 2 beds
- 1 mile away
- Best for: Couples · boat-watchers
from £415/week
View stay →Bookable via holidaycottages.co.uk
Haverfordwest · Sleeps 4 · 2 beds
Log burner
- 3 miles away
- Best for: Couples · dogs
from £353/week
View stay →Bookable via holidaycottages.co.uk
Milford Haven · Sleeps 2 · 2 beds
Log burner
- 3 miles away
- Best for: Coast Path walkers · value seekers
from £490/week
View stay →Bookable via holidaycottages.co.uk
Hygiene rating: Food Standards Agency, Open Government Licence v3.0. Checked by us. Things change — please tell us if something here is wrong.